One of the more interesting things I’ve learned over the past month is the difference in conversion rates that focused content brings. On this blog, the topics are all over the place and while I’m prohibited to share actual data, I can characterize the conversation rates around here as being very low, in the less than 1% range.
Since converting the Renewable Energy Journal to a monetized platform I’ve been able to benchmark focused content that appears there (energy, renewable, geothermal, and conservation topics) vs. the pot pourri over here. The average conversion rate overall is 5 to 12 times better on the focused content over the same time period. That is very interesting indeed as a learning mechanism to better gain benefit from the traffic through these sites.
What to expect going forward? Well, since there seem to be a number of topics I write about, look for a dedicated site for each in due course, but I’ll still aggregate them here for convenience. If you’re only interested in one topic, then you the reader can determine if you’d like to read the single topic site or stay here for the melange of things covered. Hopefully, this will give you more choices while increasing the financial return from the investment in time.
I wonder how many of your readers read your blog purely through rss feeds and never visit your site. I am one of those. I’ve seen a few other of my reagular read feeds grappeling with this issue of monetezation lately, but I don’t ever see ads on any of the feeds I get from them (including yours). I know it is certainly possible to add header’s and footers to feeds where you could plug in ads, if it is kept to a minimum it wouldn’t bother me to have these in my feeds. I’d be curious how something like that would impact monetezation….
It’s not a huge number, less than 100 readers on RSS. But I think your observation is interesting and your tolerance. I’m trying to chart the right balance between monetizing the site, but not alienating visitors. Thus far, I haven’t had any complaints, but I worry about readers who might simply abandon the site without complaining.
As for RSS, I’ll look into options, but there don’t seem to be a ton, which means for now, it’s net no change. Thanks for the comment.