
Attribution: Mike Lester, The Rome News-Tribune
As you may know (and care about or not,) the Ohio State Buckeyes will meet the Louisiana State Tigers in New Orleans January 7th, 2008 to decide the national championship for the 2007 season of Division I college football. DI (now called Bowl Championship Division) is the only division in college football that does not decide the winner of the championship through a playoff system, it’s rather, a playoff game where the participants are selected on the basis of the college coaches poll, a private poll (Harris Interactive), and the average of 6 computer ranking systems with each component accounting for 1/3 of the overall rating.
That’s how the teams got here. Now when you hear gripes and groans from outside Baton Rouge and Columbus, you’ll know why. With the preamble out of the way, this entry looks at the Ohio State Buckeye team and the season they’ve had building up to their appearance in the championship game. I did a similar preview for LSU a few days ago and will ultimately post a game preview.
Not even a Buckeye fan wearing the thickest scarlet and gray glasses predicted that the Buckeyes would be in this game, this year. I think most fans had this appearance scheduled for next year, after all, few teams get better losing a Heisman Trophy winning quarterback, a 1,000+ yard running back, three top receivers, and 75% of their starting defensive line to graduation and the NFL draft. In my season preview, I had the Bucks down for a 10-2 season and a borderline BCS participant (not championship game.) The team started out of the gate a little wobbly beating D-IAA Youngstown State and Akron in closer games than anyone would have liked. But built up momentum and confidence throughout the season. Todd Boeckman stepped in for Troy Smith and performed well, Brian Robiskie and Brian Hartline filled in for Ginn and Gonzales, the defensive line didn’t miss a beat (except when projected star Lawrence Wilson broke his leg in the first game of the season.) The defense allowed a little over 10 points per contest while the offense produced 32 points per game this year; an impressive performance in a rebuilding year.
The Buckeye schedule was comprised of 8 conference and 4 non-conference games. The out-of-conference slate included D-IAA Youngstown State, Akron, at Washington, and Kent State. Not a murder’s row to be sure, but also just what the doctor ordered to get a rebuilding team up to speed. The game in Washington was critical – even though Washington turned out to be not a very good team, when the Buckeyes met them in Seattle, they were undefeated having obliterated Syracuse on the road and soundly thumped a strong Boise State team at home. After a close first half, the Bucks pulled away as Boeckman hit his stride in the second half. The Buckeye opponents collective win/loss record for the season was 18-30.
The conference slate for the Buckeyes was respectable, due to the vagaries of the 11 team Big 10 (don’t ask me, I don’t know) two teams are missed each year. This year, the Buckeyes dropped Indiana and Iowa from the schedule. They played a slate that included Michigan and Penn State on the road (the Bucks had never beaten both UM and PSU on the road in the same season before) and a sandwich game of Illinois which turned out to be the lone loss of the season on the Illini’s strong running game and dubious calls by the officials. The most impressive performance of the year was the game at Penn State, most people predicted a loss to the Nittany Lions, road game, at night against a strong team. A recipe for collapse, the opposite happened leading to a solid win. There are two ways to view the Buckeyes season: pessimistic, they played no one and still managed to lose a game. Optimistic, they were supposed to be rebuilding and no one could touch them in competently officiated games. There is some truth in each perspective.
Ohio State’s conference foes posted a win/loss record of 55-41 which indicates that the Big 10 was dominant out-of-conference (which is true with the Big 10 sporting a 79.5% OOC win rate and a BCS league best 69% against BCS-level OOC teams.) Thus the combined record of OSU’s opponents is 73-71, a snapshot of their schedule and results are posted below:
As with the prior LSU entry, I’m not ready to make a game call yet. But I do see this as a tough matchup for the Buckeyes against a very good LSU team at home. Everything is going against OSU and that’s why they’re underdogs. I’ll post a game preview and make a call in the near future. Meanwhile, let’s enjoy the other bowls as these two teams gear up for the championship.
On December 17, Ormat Technologies Inc. (NYSE:ORA) announced a 20-year agreement with Southern California Edison for the sale of energy from ORA’s 30 megawatt plant at Imperial Valley, CA, that is expected to come on line by mid 2012. On December 18, Ormat announced the execution of agreements in the 340 MW Sarulla Geothermal Project in Indonesia where Ormat will design and supply the power generating units. These agreements indicate that ORA will not only remain as a leading geothermal power producer in US, but is also expanding its international presence.
…
The stock has been making good gains (almost 70%) since June ’07 lows. This gain has resulted in the stock breaking out of a prolonged consolidation that extended for almost a year and a half. The lofty PE (95 and 45 – Trailing and Forward respectively; Source: Yahoo Finance) makes the stock appears expensive at current levels. Nevertheless, considering the business opportunities available for ORA, any dip on the stock can be a buy opportunity for short and medium-term players. The Reno, NV based company’s policy of targeting an annual payout ratio of at least 20% of its net income (ORA has been distributing regular quarterly dividends for the last three years) makes the stock attractive for those who want a steady stream of income.
We agree that Ormat is an impressive player in the geothermal space, and the largest and most stable pure play. However, we believe the stock is tremendously expensive (even accounting for prospects and growth) at present levels.
One aspect of the company not covered in the article is the split between the equipment and electricity generation segments. We believe the equipment and electricity operations segments in the same company will prove to be problematic strategically as customers of the equipment segment increasingly see the electricity segment as a competitor. The equipment segment is about 20% of the company’s revenue and is “lumpy” from quarter to quarter. The electricity segment is where the growth is occurring. We wonder if it might not make more sense to spin out the equipment business as an “arms” dealer to all, including a separate Ormat run electricity generator.
All that being said, geothermal is the renewable that has yet to be discovered in the mainstream and it may be that there is substantial upside still possible in the stock given the overall heat of the segment. As an additional data point, traditional electricity generators trade at a PE of around 15 (Source: Yahoo Finance.)
Disclosure: The author holds no position in Ormat.
A few weeks ago I posted a story connected to this photo:
It was widely viewed and many comments were added to the original entry. Well, we now have an update on the REAL story around this plate due to an email I received from Bob Nelson last night.
FICTION – The photo of the steel blue Mini Cooper with the (M)ORONS plate in front is done very well, but is a fake. I know, because I created that particular piece of artwork. I had to convert pieces of real letters and numbers (from a sample once shown on the Department of State website) to form letters that I didn’t have. The result was a nice, though fabricated, plate. Look closely at the R and the N… they look good, but they’re merely bits and pieces of other letters/numbers. Even the S is slightly distorted. Compare them to the REAL plates shown below. Someone took my fabricated artwork and skillfully plugged it into the Mini Cooper picture. I was proud of my handiwork, but never expected it to make the internet circuit.
FACT #1 – The (M)ORONS plate really does exist, and is owned by SPAR10 PL8S member Patrick Maguire. There is also a (M)ORONZ plate. I own that one. Here is what the REAL plates look like…
FACT #2 – Someone in California will make you a plastic plate for the front of your vehicle that looks just like the fake one above. I’ve seen it… and from a distance, it looks terrific! But on closer inspection, you realize it is heavy plastic, not embossed aluminum. I will try to get the name of this person who makes it, and post the contact information here.
But if you just read that and left it alone, you’d be missing some great stuff on Bob’s website. I particularly liked his license plate gallery (here’s a screenshot of the gallery and a close up of the two MORONS MORONZ plates:)
Close-up of the MORONS/Z plates from the gallery
But wait, there’s more. Bob also toured and took photos at the license plate prison factory at Adrian, Michigan, here’s a sample from the that collection:
Great stuff Bob, thanks for the note and thanks for the laugh, I think that Morons plate is pure gold!
A colleague of ours has been exploring Panama recently and brought Rancho de Caldera to our attention. It’s a small resort set in the mountains of Panama with nine cabins and it’s largely energy independent. Despite being close to a volcano, geothermal systems are not part of the harvest system (even for heating/cooling), rather it is solar, wind, and micro hydro harvest backed by a battery bank and supplemented by a generator. The operator estimates that between 4.5 – 5 kW of electricity are generated per hour (1 kW from hydro/wind and the balance from solar.)