12.26.08 | Permalink | 2 Comments
David Bowie's Changes

Aside from ripping off a great David Bowie tune for the title, there have been some changes around here. For one thing, I’ve been restraining myself a bit in terms of what I want to say and how I say it as businesses were advertising at this site.

Effective immediately there will be no more advertising here at Musings from the Coast. A little Q & A section is listed below if you want to know more about this decision. I hope you’ll like it, the pages should load faster and the topics may get a little more interesting. If you are listed on my links (now updated to reflect things I read routinely) and you don’t wish to be, drop me a line and I’ll drop the reference to your site.

Q: – Dude, don’t you want the money advertising generates?

A: – Admittedly, there was a little money involved, but in the end, I decided unrestrained free speech was a better model for this venue. And, it’s not like I was going along the path of being PopSugar or something anyway, so there’s no real loss from my perspective.

Q: – Would you consider taking ads again?

A: – Sure, you never say never. Drop me a line at mike (at) montara ventures (dot) com and I’ll read your proposal before saying no.

Q: – But seriously, isn’t there money involved?

A: – Yes, but not serious money. The display ads from local businesses were by far the most profitable ads on the site. Many of them became increasingly uncomfortable with my political and religious views and asked me to tone it down lest it reflect badly on their businesses. As they were my customers, I felt compelled to take their perspective into account.

Q: – But, I liked your ads. Can’t you bring them back?

A: – Glad you liked them. No I won’t bring them back.

Q: – OK, so what does this mean to me, one of your three loyal readers?

A: – 1) Page load time should be faster without all the javascript and extra images. 2) I will feel free to explore more varied and controversial topics that may have violated prior terms of service. 3) Perhaps you’ll see a bit more borderline humor and images.

Q: – Will this change your comment policy?

A: – No, I will continue to moderate comments to prevent spam from appearing in this venue. I will continue to post non-spam, comments, even comments that are objectionable to me personally, in the interest of free speech. The only exception to the “no moderation for content” policy is if the content of the comment is of the hate/neo-nazi/crazy whacko vein; in which case it will simply move to the spam bucket. Controversial responses to posts that stay away from the stuff mentioned above will be posted as submitted and are encouraged. Dialogue adds to the richness of the discussion and often more can be learned from disagreement on a topic.


Proof of Efficiacy of Prayer

12.26.08 | Permalink | Comments Off on Proof of Efficiacy of Prayer

Eddie does it again, he’s one funny dude. Now we know that statistics and probability will also be banned alongside the evolution. Clearly, these are dangerous concepts!


Choose the Third Door

12.26.08 | Permalink | Comments Off on Choose the Third Door
Three doors are presented, take the third door rather than capitulating or giving into anger

While perusing the RSS feeds this morning I came across an entry from my pal Sin-Yaw at Loud Thoughts referencing an event that transpired at a Starbucks that became a minor news sensation. The net of the story is in a drive-through lane in a Starbucks a fellow patron was rude and impatient. Rather than reacting in kind or asking for forgiveness, Arthur Rosenfeld bought coffee (and breakfast) for the 5 people in the vehicle behind him and drove away.

This action spawned a chain reaction which lasted throughout the day where people purchased the beverages/meals of those behind them throughout the day. A touching story to be sure, but I think the more important bit of the story is in how we respond to every day adversity. Speaking as someone with a bit of a temper (for those who really know me, don’t laugh at the understatement) I can say that I struggle with this situation routinely.

As Sin-Yaw and Rosenfeld point out, there are three possible responses to such stimuli: react in kind, meet force with force; or capitulate, give in and grovel; or find an alternative to either of the aforementioned behaviors. That’s what Rosenfeld did – he found the proverbial third door. And that’s what we should all aspire to do when faced with adversity. It’s a struggle, but one that is entirely worthwhile to overcome.

Politics, Religion

Is Rick Warren Really the Issue?

12.26.08 | Permalink | Comments Off on Is Rick Warren Really the Issue?
Warren and Obama on stage

By now, you’ve heard about the furor caused in the blogosphere by President-Elect Barack Obama’s selection of megachurch megaphone Rick Warren to give the invocation at the inauguration next month. If perchance you’ve not been following the news, then you can read up on the selection here and here and here.

Despite the fact that Warren is a bigot, he’s no bigger biggot than any of the other religious figures who could have been chosen for this role. No, I don’t think the selection of Warren is the problem. And as usual, we’ve missed the reason to actually be outraged.

The real issues at stake here are freedom of religion and separation of church and state. That Obama, or any other politician for that matter, feels compelled to have someone offer a prayer at a government ceremony strikes right at the heart of the matter. Not only should Rick Warren be watching from the sidelines, so should every other religious leader. They’re neither needed nor welcome. The assumption that any incoming President must have a religious leader offer a prayer, is, in fact, a religious test for suitability to hold office.

If one was to say “I want religion in my inauguration” then one would be compelled to include a representative from ALL religions to provide equal time. And that would make for a long ceremony once Church of Googlers, Assembly of God, Mormons, Flying Spaghetti Monsterists, Christian Scientists, Islamists, Zoroastrians, Wiccans, Satanists, etc. and the rest of the tens of thousands of religions were included. Thus, since it is not practical to include all religions, none should be involved in the ceremony and the fact that we’ve forgotten this is as a nation is the true reason to be outraged.

The reality is, there’s not much of a line separating the United States of America from a Taliban-Afghanistan – both theocracies, both alleging freedom (though you’re free to practice any religion as long as it’s the “right” religion.)

For convenience sake, I share with you below Thomas Jefferson’s 1801 inaugural address which happened after Congress resolved a tie of 73 to 73 electoral votes between Jefferson and Burr, each of which defeated John Adams. You’ll notice no reference to a Judeo-Christian god – you will notice two references that could be interpreted to mean god, “providence” and “infinite power”. Read on, this is what was intended. How have we strayed so far?

Friends and Fellow-Citizens:

CALLED upon to undertake the duties of the first executive office of our country, I avail myself of the presence of that portion of my fellow-citizens which is here assembled to express my grateful thanks for the favor with which they have been pleased to look toward me, to declare a sincere consciousness that the task is above my talents, and that I approach it with those anxious and awful presentiments which the greatness of the charge and the weakness of my powers so justly inspire. A rising nation, spread over a wide and fruitful land, traversing all the seas with the rich productions of their industry, engaged in commerce with nations who feel power and forget right, advancing rapidly to destinies beyond the reach of mortal eye—when I contemplate these transcendent objects, and see the honor, the happiness, and the hopes of this beloved country committed to the issue, and the auspices of this day, I shrink from the contemplation, and humble myself before the magnitude of the undertaking. Utterly, indeed, should I despair did not the presence of many whom I here see remind me that in the other high authorities provided by our Constitution I shall find resources of wisdom, of virtue, and of zeal on which to rely under all difficulties. To you, then, gentlemen, who are charged with the sovereign functions of legislation, and to those associated with you, I look with encouragement for that guidance and support which may enable us to steer with safety the vessel in which we are all embarked amidst the conflicting elements of a troubled world.

During the contest of opinion through which we have passed the animation of discussions and of exertions has sometimes worn an aspect which might impose on strangers unused to think freely and to speak and to write what they think; but this being now decided by the voice of the nation, announced according to the rules of the Constitution, all will, of course, arrange themselves under the will of the law, and unite in common efforts for the common good. All, too, will bear in mind this sacred principle, that though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will to be rightful must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights, which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression. Let us, then, fellow-citizens, unite with one heart and one mind. Let us restore to social intercourse that harmony and affection without which liberty and even life itself are but dreary things. And let us reflect that, having banished from our land that religious intolerance under which mankind so long bled and suffered, we have yet gained little if we countenance a political intolerance as despotic, as wicked, and capable of as bitter and bloody persecutions. During the throes and convulsions of the ancient world, during the agonizing spasms of infuriated man, seeking through blood and slaughter his long-lost liberty, it was not wonderful that the agitation of the billows should reach even this distant and peaceful shore; that this should be more felt and feared by some and less by others, and should divide opinions as to measures of safety. But every difference of opinion is not a difference of principle. We have called by different names brethren of the same principle. We are all Republicans, we are all Federalists. If there be any among us who would wish to dissolve this Union or to change its republican form, let them stand undisturbed as monuments of the safety with which error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it. I know, indeed, that some honest men fear that a republican government can not be strong, that this Government is not strong enough; but would the honest patriot, in the full tide of successful experiment, abandon a government which has so far kept us free and firm on the theoretic and visionary fear that this Government, the world’s best hope, may by possibility want energy to preserve itself? I trust not. I believe this, on the contrary, the strongest Government on earth. I believe it the only one where every man, at the call of the law, would fly to the standard of the law, and would meet invasions of the public order as his own personal concern. Sometimes it is said that man can not be trusted with the government of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others? Or have we found angels in the forms of kings to govern him? Let history answer this question.

Let us, then, with courage and confidence pursue our own Federal and Republican principles, our attachment to union and representative government. Kindly separated by nature and a wide ocean from the exterminating havoc of one quarter of the globe; too high-minded to endure the degradations of the others; possessing a chosen country, with room enough for our descendants to the thousandth and thousandth generation; entertaining a due sense of our equal right to the use of our own faculties, to the acquisitions of our own industry, to honor and confidence from our fellow-citizens, resulting not from birth, but from our actions and their sense of them; enlightened by a benign religion, professed, indeed, and practiced in various forms, yet all of them inculcating honesty, truth, temperance, gratitude, and the love of man; acknowledging and adoring an overruling Providence, which by all its dispensations proves that it delights in the happiness of man here and his greater happiness hereafter—with all these blessings, what more is necessary to make us a happy and a prosperous people? Still one thing more, fellow-citizens—a wise and frugal Government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government, and this is necessary to close the circle of our felicities.

About to enter, fellow-citizens, on the exercise of duties which comprehend everything dear and valuable to you, it is proper you should understand what I deem the essential principles of our Government, and consequently those which ought to shape its Administration. I will compress them within the narrowest compass they will bear, stating the general principle, but not all its limitations. Equal and exact justice to all men, of whatever state or persuasion, religious or political; peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none; the support of the State governments in all their rights, as the most competent administrations for our domestic concerns and the surest bulwarks against antirepublican tendencies; the preservation of the General Government in its whole constitutional vigor, as the sheet anchor of our peace at home and safety abroad; a jealous care of the right of election by the people—a mild and safe corrective of abuses which are lopped by the sword of revolution where peaceable remedies are unprovided; absolute acquiescence in the decisions of the majority, the vital principle of republics, from which is no appeal but to force, the vital principle and immediate parent of despotism; a well disciplined militia, our best reliance in peace and for the first moments of war, till regulars may relieve them; the supremacy of the civil over the military authority; economy in the public expense, that labor may be lightly burthened; the honest payment of our debts and sacred preservation of the public faith; encouragement of agriculture, and of commerce as its handmaid; the diffusion of information and arraignment of all abuses at the bar of the public reason; freedom of religion; freedom of the press, and freedom of person under the protection of the habeas corpus, and trial by juries impartially selected. These principles form the bright constellation which has gone before us and guided our steps through an age of revolution and reformation. The wisdom of our sages and blood of our heroes have been devoted to their attainment. They should be the creed of our political faith, the text of civic instruction, the touchstone by which to try the services of those we trust; and should we wander from them in moments of error or of alarm, let us hasten to retrace our steps and to regain the road which alone leads to peace, liberty, and safety.

I repair, then, fellow-citizens, to the post you have assigned me. With experience enough in subordinate offices to have seen the difficulties of this the greatest of all, I have learnt to expect that it will rarely fall to the lot of imperfect man to retire from this station with the reputation and the favor which bring him into it. Without pretensions to that high confidence you reposed in our first and greatest revolutionary character, whose preeminent services had entitled him to the first place in his country’s love and destined for him the fairest page in the volume of faithful history, I ask so much confidence only as may give firmness and effect to the legal administration of your affairs. I shall often go wrong through defect of judgment. When right, I shall often be thought wrong by those whose positions will not command a view of the whole ground. I ask your indulgence for my own errors, which will never be intentional, and your support against the errors of others, who may condemn what they would not if seen in all its parts. The approbation implied by your suffrage is a great consolation to me for the past, and my future solicitude will be to retain the good opinion of those who have bestowed it in advance, to conciliate that of others by doing them all the good in my power, and to be instrumental to the happiness and freedom of all.

Relying, then, on the patronage of your good will, I advance with obedience to the work, ready to retire from it whenever you become sensible how much better choice it is in your power to make. And may that Infinite Power which rules the destinies of the universe lead our councils to what is best, and give them a favorable issue for your peace and prosperity.

Now that’s an inauguration speech, and one that keeps true to the American spirit that calls upon a strict separation of church and state. Let’s hope we can turn the tide and return to such ideals over the next years.

Energy, Innovation

SF Solar Map

12.23.08 | Permalink | Comments Off on SF Solar Map

Live San Francisco Solar Map

The San Francisco Solar Map put together by CH2MHill is really cool. Go check it out, it has installations and case studies. One nit however, it totally misses the biggest and most impressive PV installation in the city – the roof of the new California Academy of Sciences building in Golden Gate Park. Presumably they’ll catch and correct this oversight.

« Previous Entries
» Next Entries