Commentary

Global Warming: The Proof is in the Knickers

09.05.07 | Permalink | 1 Comment


Attribution: 21st Century Citizen
Photo showing the evolution of women's underwear as the earth warms up...

All kidding aside, this photo is from an excellent essay on personal leadership on the issue from 21st Century Citizen. It is a blog I read routinely and recommend you add to your list if you care about this sort of thing.

Business, Energy

Glitnir to invest $1B in geothermal

09.05.07 | Permalink | Comments Off on Glitnir to invest $1B in geothermal

Originally published at Montara Energy Ventures.

Via Inside Greentech:

Iceland’s Glitnir Bank released a report today on the booming geothermal market in the U.S., and it intends to be a part of it.

The bank, which opened its first U.S. office in New York today, said it plans to invest $1 billion in U.S. geothermal energy projects over the next five years.

“The challenges are numerous, but the potential is huge,” Arni Magnusson, managing director of sustainable energy for Glitnir, told a press conference today.

[…]

In its report, Glitnir predicts a more than six-fold increase in the annual sales of electricity from geothermal sources in the United States to $11 billion in 2025, up from $1.8 billion now.

The report said geothermal energy could fill up to 20 percent of California’s electricity needs, 60 percent of Nevada’s and 30 percent of Hawaii’s.

Glitnir is no stranger to geothermal, with 90 percent of all houses in Iceland being heated geothermally.

But it says the U.S. is a global leader in geothermal, with a current installed capacity of 2,800 megawatts and annual electricity generation of 16,000 gigawatt hours. Current projects, when completed, could bring that installed capacity up by another 2,800 megawatts, according to Glitnir.

Read more…

Business

China’s lead-gate

09.05.07 | Permalink | Comments Off on China’s lead-gate


Recalled Barbie Playset
Recalled Barbie play set due to lead poisoning

Mattel has just announced another toy recall related to unsafe lead levels. Where will this end? I’m guessing that this is just the beginning of a whole slate of products produced in China being tested and recalled – we haven’t even seen the start on the non-toy consumer side.

I’m guessing that quality control processes for offshore manufacturing will be modified to look for lead and other harmful contaminents soon…but for now, beware of all products produced in China because it’s clear that they’ve not been testing for lead to date. Might there be an opportunity for a third-party testing company to certify products as lead-free? I’m thinking yes…

The list of toys affected by this latest recall is available here.

Energy

Geysir now owns 18.8% of Western GeoPower

09.04.07 | Permalink | Comments Off on Geysir now owns 18.8% of Western GeoPower

Originally published at Montara Energy Ventures.

Via Yahoo News:

REYKJANESBAER, ICELAND–(Marketwire – Aug. 31, 2007) – To comply with securities laws in Canada, Geysir Green Energy ehf. (“Geysir”) wishes to announce that today it acquired ownership of 25,000,000 common shares of Western GeoPower Corp. (TSX VENTURE:WGP – News; FRANKFURT:WE6 – News; “WGP”), representing approximately 13.7% of WGP’s outstanding common shares, pursuant to a private placement subscription agreement at $0.25 per share. Following this transaction, Geysir owns 34,333,334 common shares of WGP, representing approximately 18.8% of WGP’s outstanding common shares, and 9,333,334 warrants exercisable to purchase one common share of WGP at $0.35 per share. Geysir’s acquisition of WGP shares in this transaction was for investment purposes only. Geysir may, depending on market and other conditions, acquire additional common shares of WGP through market transactions, private agreements or otherwise. Geysir may, depending on market conditions, sell any or all of its common shares of WGP.

Commentary

Top 10 most likely ways to die…

09.04.07 | Permalink | 5 Comments

Welcome Stumblers! I hope you enjoy this entry – if you like it please give it a thumbs up, hang around a little bit, and check out my other content. We have a very easy RSS subscription to keep you in the loop. Thanks for dropping by and I hope you enjoy your visit.

What are the most likely ways to die here in the US? The answer might surprise you. For a person born in the year 2003, the list below represents the 10 most likely death methods…


Table containing the top 10 manners of accidental or self-inflicted deaths ordered by odds of death for a person born in the year 2003.

Notes: These odds do not include mortality by disease or natural causes – these odds are related to external factors and self-determined factors. The data was catalogued by the National Safety Council and the source is available here. The data in the table represents the highest risk at the “leaf level” from the charts. There are higher risks across aggregations of factors.

It’s pretty clear from the table above that one should steer clear of firearms, drugs, falling, and driving! When you look at the aggregated categories, it’s even more clear. The items above are discrete leaf level causes of death. For example, the lifetime odds of dying from an accident are 1 in 34. Getting more specific, the lifetime odds of dying from a transport accident are 1 in 78, getting even more specific, the lifetime odds of dying in a motor vehicle related accident are 1 in 84. The highest leaf level risk is listed above in the chart, occupant in a car accident at 1 in 237.

There are also some odd ways to die that are recorded. A couple of interesting ones are:

  • Three people were killed by ignition or melting of nightware. Lifetime odds of death in this manner? 1 in 1,249,356.
  • Forty eight people were killed by overexertion, travel and privation. Lifetime odds of death in this manner? 1 in 78,085
  • Five hundred and ninety-seven people were killed by slipping, tripping, and stumbling. Lifetime odds of death in this manner? 1 in 6,278

Data like this is very interesting. I think it shows us where we, as a society, should be investing in our own safety. Curiously, in 2003 in the US there were no deaths due to terrorism. If we wind back the clock to the year 2001 and look at the 3,000 deaths due to terror and run these numbers, we come up with a single year number of 1 in 95,075 and a lifetime number of 1,225. However, if we do this calculation for the year 2003, the odds are astronomical because there were no recorded fatalities due to terrorism in that year on US soil. The risk isn’t zero, but it’s not particularly high either, it doesn’t crack the top 10 even with 2001 data.

The numbers are clear – our priorities are wrong with regard to dealing with the real risks of death in our society.

If you liked this entry, why not give it a thumbs up?


« Previous Entries
» Next Entries